What the session surveys show
These selected examples describe survey-response records from named sessions. They measure perceived urgency, not AI adoption, reduced reluctance, lasting behaviour change or student outcomes.
Opening and feedback respondents were not individually matched. Their overlap and response rates are unknown. Opening surveys may have been collected after a session began. The differences do not establish that a session caused lasting change. Response records are not counts of verified unique people or all attendees.
Holy Family educators — August 28, 2026
The opening and feedback surveys asked the same question:
How urgent is it for you to adapt your practice to a world increasingly shaped by AI?
The result counts responses selecting “immediate priority.”
| Survey | Selected / valid answers | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Opening | 43 / 77 | 55.84% (56% rounded) |
| Same-day feedback | 59 / 68 | 86.76% (87% rounded) |
The difference between the response pools is 30.92 percentage points. The primary analysis includes August 28 responses. An August 30 opening-survey record and an August 29 feedback record were excluded; the later feedback record repeated an earlier response pattern. The opening survey was an early session activity.
CWL National Convention — August 11, 2026
Both surveys asked:
How urgent is it for us to help prepare our families and communities for a world increasingly shaped by AI?
The result counts responses selecting “immediate priority.”
| Survey | Selected / valid answers | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Opening | 207 / 294 | 70.41% (70% rounded) |
| Same-day feedback | 178 / 183 | 97.27% (97% rounded) |
The difference between the response pools is 26.86 percentage points. Of 304 same-day opening submissions, one late record after the first feedback response omitted the compared items and was excluded. Of the remaining 303, 294 answered this question and nine did not. All 183 same-day feedback records answered it. Later September 7 opening and August 13 feedback submissions were excluded. Feedback extended through the event day; it was not necessarily submitted immediately at session end.
This is evidence about perceived family/community preparation priorities in a faith-community setting. It does not measure later family behaviour or workplace performance.
Results vary across events
These examples are not a typical or universal result. At the Lloydminster educator session on August 26, 2026, the same personal-practice question used at Holy Family received 56/107 (52.34%) opening responses and 57/81 (70.37%) same-day feedback responses selecting immediate priority: a difference of 18.03 percentage points. Two nominal opening submissions recorded after the feedback window were excluded.
In that event’s feedback, 53/81 (65.43%) rated the session 4 or 5 out of 5; 28/81 selected 2 or 3. Comments also included unresolved concerns. Session ratings describe experience, not measured learning or lasting impact.
Analysis record
Prepared from PaveEDU’s September 26, 2026 Session Impact Audit, Public Claims Library entries P04, P08, P12 and P13, and the event-level comparison record. The audit was AI-assisted; no external human statistician review has been completed. No participant-level responses, names or quotations are published here.
Questions about the method: info@paveedu.org.